I’m a passionate writer who loves exploring ideas, sharing stories, and connecting with readers through meaningful content.I’m dedicated to sharing insights and stories that make readers think, feel, and discover something new.
Introduction
The US State Department has recently announced a significant change in its official communication style, instructing diplomats to cease using the Calibri font and revert to the classic Times New Roman. This decision marks a notable shift in typography preferences, reflecting broader cultural and aesthetic considerations.
The Decision to Change Fonts
In a memo circulated among diplomats, the State Department emphasized the need for a more traditional and formal appearance in official documents. Times New Roman, known for its classic and authoritative look, was deemed more suitable for diplomatic communications. The decision to move away from Calibri, often associated with modernity and informality, underscores a desire to project a more conventional image.

Reasons Behind the Change
The shift back to Times New Roman is not just a matter of aesthetics. It reflects a broader cultural shift within the department, aiming to align with traditional values and practices. The choice of font can significantly impact the perception of a document, and Times New Roman is often seen as more professional and serious compared to the more contemporary Calibri.
Times New Roman is perceived as more formal.
Calibri is considered modern and informal.
The change aligns with traditional diplomatic values.
Impact on Diplomatic Communications
This change is expected to affect all official documents, including memos, reports, and correspondence. By standardizing the font to Times New Roman, the State Department aims to ensure consistency and professionalism in its communications. This move is also likely to influence other governmental agencies and organizations that look to the State Department for guidance on best practices.

Reactions and Implications
The decision has sparked discussions among diplomats and typographers alike. While some welcome the return to a classic font, others question the necessity of such a change. The implications of this decision extend beyond aesthetics, potentially influencing how diplomatic communications are perceived globally.
For more insights on typography in official communications, visit our Technology section.
Conclusion
The US State Department's decision to revert to Times New Roman highlights the importance of typography in official communications. As diplomats adjust to this change, the broader implications for diplomatic practices and perceptions remain to be seen.
Further Reading
Related articles in this category
US State DepartmentTimes New RomanCalibritypographydiplomatic communicationsfont changetraditional valuesofficial documentsaestheticsprofessionalism









